Using science 400 years ago, we have come a very deep understanding of the natural world, but so far that deep understanding does not involve us. It is very important for us to grow up in the face of constant threats to understand our place in the universe. And I think that unless we actually address the question of what life is, we will actually understand ourselves in the systems in which we live. Because we don't know what life is, we don't know where to look. What worries me the most is that we may just miss it because we actually have no idea what we want. And we think of the meanings of life in the wrong way. That means I am interested in understanding whether there is life somewhere else, but I am also interested in understanding ourselves. And so most of my work is very focused on understanding the origin of life on Earth. To do that, my team builds thousands of organisms or organisms and thousands of ecosystems and looks at their chemical properties. In the world, we are surrounded by life, but we do not know how common life patterns are. We do not know how many different life forms we can take, we do not know what limits to its size or timescales apply to it. We may have experienced the life of a foreigner and not even noticed it. There is this belief that we do that because we are alive, we actually see life when we see it or understand what life is, and I think that is actually a really wrong view. For a long time, it was thought that, if we saw oxygen in the exoplanet, that was a sign of health and we would be able to claim the victory we had gained as aliens. But scientists have thought about it a little bit, it turns out that you can make oxygen in the atmosphere easily with simple models that have no life. We really need a common definition of life that does not depend on the specific chemicals used by life on Earth but which is a further aspect of that life which is a process that organizes chemicals and does all the good things we associate with living matter. So I, for example, have a broad definition of life that includes things like technology. Part of the reason for that is that, if you found a phone on Mars, you might not think you found life, but you would probably think you found evidence of life because the chances of that phone being zero without the life process put it there.

 Life is literally an art philosophy. It is a creative process in the universe. He is not a person in that process. The whole process, how does knowledge begin in the universe and how does it increase the space and time to build everything that we associate with life? Most vague descriptions of life as we know they are flawed because they are built around a very small single sample, the living biosphere from which we have already emerged. So whatever our creative or creative technology or our future generations will be will be a part of our life or an example of our biosphere. To better understand the possibilities of life, we must find a second example elsewhere. Because unless we find the issues of how life is possible, I don't think we really are what life is. It is likely that our sample will be doubled as we test our solar system. We can find evidence of lifeon Mars, Europa, Enceladus. More recently there has been evidence of phosphines, potential biomarkers, in the atmosphere of Venus. Some of these places are as healthy in life as we know them, but they may be as healthy as we don't know them to be. - So my favorite thing is to try to understand whether there are laws in the universe that define living things in the same way as we have found the laws of the universe that define gravitational force and if they are equally fundamental and fundamental to the true structure in which we live - Describe gravity. in our knowledge of it, the mechanism that helped us to understand the waves, the orbits of planets and comets, equinoxes, and finally humans in the test of our planet. Having a meaning in life will enhance our chances of finding something out of the world and can open our eyes to a world of possibilities that we have not yet imagined. - It's hard to imagine what it will be like when we fully understand who we are. All the technology we have is not included in our understanding of the world. And if you add that level of understanding and technology we create, then it is possible for our personality and technology to reach the next level, whatever it is, which we can expect so far. The many forms of deep understanding that I follow, I think, are very important for the longevity of life and extend our reach to the universe beyond our planet.